AudienceBloom

CALL US:  1-877-545-GROW

The Blog

Ready to get serious about growing your website? Get a free proposal

Google Penguin: 5 Recovery Facts You Need to Know

Published by | 5 Comments

Google Penguin WarriorNow that Google Penguin has had some time to sink in, we have an opportunity to reflect on what exactly Penguin changed, the aftermath of Penguin, and (most importantly), what steps should be taken to recover from a Penguin penalty.

As I previously wrote, Penguin targeted inbound link profiles. While Panda 3.3 and 3.4 devalued certain elements of anchor text (most notably, exact-match anchor text), Penguin actually slapped a penalty on it. With access to client data as well as dozens of folks who’ve reached out and asked for link profile audits, I’ve seen some specific trends that are undeniable. In this post, I’ll discuss the trends that I see in every Penguin-affected link profile, while pointing out supporting evidence from other SEO gurus and webmasters that have noted similar trends. My goal is to definitively outline what Google Penguin changed, and what you (SEOs and webmasters) should do about it.

Fact #1: Reconsideration Requests Won’t Help You

Penguin is an algorithmic penalty, and Matt Cutts has stated that reconsideration requests won’t help you for algorithmic penalties. Matt Cutts explains the difference between algorithm and manual penalties in the video below. At right around the 2:00 mark, Matt Cutts explains that reconsideration requests won’t do you any good if you have an algorithmic penalty.

Search Engine Land confirms this as well, here:

However, Google says this is an algorithmic change — IE, it’s a penalty that’s applied automatically, rather than a human at Google spotting some spam and applying what’s called a manual penality. Because of that, Google said that reconsideration requests won’t help with Penguin.

Fact #2: Your Inbound Link Profile is Probably What’s Hurting You

Assuming you’re not engaging in some obviously shady onsite keyword stuffing, your inbound link profile is what caused your rankings to drop if your site took a dive on or around April 24th. Multiple sources have backed this up, including Search Engine Watch in this article:

The Penguin algo seems to be looking at three major factors:

  • If the majority of a website’s backlinks are low quality or spammy looking (e.g., sponsored links, links in the footers, links from directories, links from link exchange pages, links from low quality blog networks).
  • If majority of a website’s backlinks are from unrelated websites.
  • If too many links are pointing back to a website with exact match keywords in the anchor texts

Google changed the way its algorithm calculates value based on inbound links. With the rollout of Panda 3.3, anchor text was severely devalued. Penguin actually added a penalty for over-optimized inbound anchor text. Google did this to make it harder for SEOs to get their clients ranked well in the search engines, in the hopes that those clients would turn to Google Adwords instead.

Fact #3: Removing Bad Links Will Help

Since Penguin is an algorithmic penalty, and the spam flag in the algorithm is related to an unnatural link profile, then it makes sense to remove the links that could be causing this algorithmic flag. In the video above, at the 0:46 mark, Matt Cutts says:

“So, if your site is affected by an algorithm, for the most part, if you change your site, whatever the characteristics are that’s flagging, triggering, or causing us to think you might have keyword stuffing, or whatever, if you change your site, then after we’ve re-crawled and re-indexed the page, and some period after that when we’ve re-processed that in our algorithms, for the most part your site should be able to pop back up or increase in its rankings.

So, I think it’s safe to assume that removing bad links will help.

Note: At AudienceBloom, we offer inbound link profile audits. We can comb through your inbound link profile, diagnose why your website fell in the rankings, suggest specific links to remove, and outline a plan of action moving forward. Call or Contact Us for a quote!

Fact #4: Diluting Your Inbound Link Profile with New Links Will Help

There are multiple case studies that have been published (and I have verified them with my own clients’ data) that conclude that the primary problem plaguing sites affected by Penguin is over-optimized anchor text for their primary target keywords. One of the most popular studies published was the one from MicroSite Masters here, stating:

What anchor text should you be using? From the data we’ve evaluated, “MySiteDomain.com”, “MySiteDomain”, “http://mysitedomain.com”, “http://www.mysitedomain.com”, “The Title of My Website”, “here”, and “the title of one of my H1′s (that isn’t a keyword I’m trying to rank for)”, were generally used as anchors on sites that were not affected by the most recent Google update and are probably a good starting point to consider using moving forward.

If you’ve read my other blogs, you’ll see that on March 9th (nearly 2 months before the MicroSite Masters case study) I publushed this article stating:

Another element of a natural-looking link profile is what’s called “junk” anchor text, LSI anchor text, and naked URLs. These are anchors that say “click here”, “here”, “Website”, “yoururl.com”, “www.yoururl.com”, etc.

SEONitro published another case study concluding the following:

[Anchor text] is probably the biggest post Panda/Penguin disqualifier as in most sites we will have researched did not diversify their link anchor density and were hit hard this go around with the “exact match” dial down. As we go up to Case Study #2 we find that our affected sites have VERY LITTLE brand incoming links.

Jonathan Leger published a case study concluding that exact-match anchor text for sites that are ranking well post-Penguin is about 10% on average:

It probably won’t come as much of a surprise for me to tell you that the average EMA for a site is pretty low — just 10% across all of the markets.
Also, if you’re not using EMDs, it’s important to diversify your anchor text a lot. How much is “a lot” really depends on your market. So do the research. Check out the link profiles of other ranking sites in your market and see what their anchor text looks like.

TopMarketingStrategies.com published a lengthy observation packed with valuable insight as well:

Another option is that you can simply try to “dilute” the anchor text optimization by adding more links to that page with very diverse anchor text. This is the more likely option for most and it is what most are doing because it’s easier and cheaper (most of the time).

UniqueArticleWizard.com published an article with their observations and tips for recovering from Penguin in this article:

One of the most notable updates in Penguin was an “Over Optimization” algorithm. This update specifically targeted Keyword Anchor Text as it relates to the underlying link.

What are some things that can help you recover from Penguin?

1) Get new additional links with generic anchor text for your site
2) Build no more than 50% of your backlinks with targeted anchor text

Neil Patel wrote a great article explaining his findings over at QuickSprout:

One of the unnatural link building signals that Panda 3.4 aims at is too many exact anchor text links. Standard practice used to be you’d aim for about 30% to 50% matches…now that numbers dropped drastically. So test the waters out and start with 5% or so and increase slowly.

On June 8th, Search Engine Land published its latest thoughts on Penguin:

If you think that you were hit by Penguin, I recommend building a few links to your site with diversified anchor text. Stay away from exact match anchor text.

On June 21st, ArticleRanks sent out an email to its list with Penguin recovery advice:

Start diversifying your anchors to the point that you are totally diluting the anchors you already have in place, then on future penguin refreshes the filter will be lifted from your site. We have already recovered a couple of sites like this.

Time for a shameless plug! At AudienceBloom, we offer SEO link building packages aimed at diluting your inbound link profile. If you’re suffering from a post-Panda 3.3 or Penguin penalty, we can help!

Fact #5: Take Action, Have Patience, and Everything Will be Just Fine

SEO is a rapidly changing industry. Since its inception, SEOs have been doing their best to analyze and adapt to search engine algorithms. When a major update like Penguin comes along and tanks your website’s traffic, the urge to give up may be strong; it may feel like you’ve just lost everything you’ve worked for. But in reality, it’s not about how many times you get knocked down. It’s about how many times you get back up.

But it’s not just about getting back up and holding your ground. Without taking action, your website won’t see any recovery, as we learned from Matt Cutts’ video above.

Conclusion:

So, what can you do right now to take action and recover from Google Penguin?

1. Audit your link profile and diagnose why your website lost its rankings

2. Remove bad links identified in the audit

3. Engage in a new SEO link building campaign to dilute your current inbound link profile and get a healthy mix of diverse anchor text links.

I hope the information I’ve outlined here helps you recover from Google Penguin. If you found it helpful, leave a comment!

avatar

Jayson DeMers

Jayson DeMers is the Founder & CEO of AudienceBloom. You can contact him on LinkedIn, Google+, or Twitter.

Looking to grow your traffic?

Our managed SEO and social campaigns and high domain authority link building will increase your presence and organic search engine traffic.

Request a rate card

Want more great resources?

Check out our new Resource Library, with over 100 expert articles spanning all aspects of online marketing, divided into 16 chapters.

See our Resource Library
  • http://www.anyplace-control.com/ Yuriy

    Good post and interesting links to source articles.
    1. But almost none of SEO gurus tells about Exact-Match-Domains (EMD) and how to recover from Pinguin. I mean when domain name contains exact-match-keywords, like remote-desktop-control.com. Link profile of such domain will contain a lot of exact-match-keywords (domain name). Moreover google doesn’t like EMD, because domain name is already spammed in google’s eyes. No any research articles about such domains. Tactics of recovery for EMD can be different. What is your thoughts about EMD?

    2. What is concerning deleting links with exact-match-keywords.
    There are a lot of link which are not under my control (for example my articles submitted to articles directories, but were copied by other webmasters a lot).
    If I contact to webmaster with request to delete link, I will need to write strong arguments which will motivate webmaster to actions. In most cases (if argument is not strong), webmaster will ignore my reques. If I will inform that “google doesn’t link link to me on your web-site that caused my penality. Please delete my link if possible”, surely my request will be ignored. Perhaps you know tactics how to communicate with web-master to get good chances for deleting of links? What to write in the request? And how to automate the process of deleting: for example I know hundreds of links to my web-site from different domains. It is unreal to contact each web-master personally. Moreover I do not know their e-mail. It will be good if there is special tool which automatically extracts e-mail addresses of web-masters from the list of domains.
    Can you comment this issue?

    3. Concerning site-wide links in footer on every web page with the same anchor text.
    Theoretically these links should be deleted as they can hurt. But what if these links are placed on relevant and trusted domains? Practically, deleting of such links can cause drop of my web-site authority/trust/rank. There is idea to leave site-wide link in footer, but to change anchor text for every web-page. Is it good idea?

  • Jack Yan

    One of the best pieces with real concrete steps on the Penguin changes—thank you, Jayson!

  • http://www.brooksidedental.com/blog Gil Pauley

    Nice article – I like your idea of link dilution and your examples of different types of anchor texts. I have often thought that much of what big G does is to drive people to their adwords rather than providing a “better search experience”, but you are the first person I have seen state it. There are several bad link tools available. I just finished using one on all the sites that had linked to my blog. It is not perfect but will give you a good indication if something is really bad. On the borderline ones, you have to make your own decisions. I ran everything including the legitimate looking dentistry links through this last week and found many sites no longer exist. One dentistry office (nice looking website) had 119 bad links to gambling, online pharmacy and p-no sites. That stunned me. Sites will show up as bad if some of the British “essex” and “sussex” sites have linked to you, but these are OK. Some legitimate blogs that discuss certain pharmacy related issues and problems will also show up which may be OK. Therefore, you have to look carefully at each site/link flagged as “bad”. I purged about 90 links that I had previously approved for our blog in the last 3 years. So I feel a little better now. Good luck to your readers.

  • Eduard

    Anyone can show something, study case regarding Penguin Recovery? Results? No One :)

  • http://marketsonline.co.za Dan Boateng

    I have been articles by Jayson and all of them have been really helpful. This post is no exception. Nice.

Success! We've just sent an email containing a download link for your selected resource. Please check your spam folder if you don't receive it within 5 minutes. Enjoy!

Love,

-The AudienceBloom Team